Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Voter Rolls topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee rejects bill to let state send voter list to credit bureau for address checks

Colorado House State, Veterans, and Military Affairs Committee · February 23, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A measure to let the Secretary of State submit limited voter data to a credit bureau for address verification failed in committee after months of pilots and spirited testimony for and against; supporters cited El Paso County pilots and lower undeliverable ballots; privacy groups warned of data quality and breach risks.

The committee voted down House Bill 11-04 on a narrow vote after a sustained hearing on whether the state should contract with a private credit bureau to compare limited voter fields and return potential address updates to county clerks.

What the bill would have done: Rep. Bradfield proposed that the Secretary of State submit a minimal dataset (first name, last name, year of birth and the voters recorded residential address) to a private credit bureau to identify possible address discrepancies and return suggested matches to county clerks for follow-up. Confidential-voter categories would be excluded.

Supporters and pilots: El Paso County and some smaller counties described operational pilots and said the tool substantially reduced undeliverable ballots and triggered voter-initiated updates. "We have used third party credit bureau data since 2023...we have reviewed approximately 91,084 records," said El Paso County Clerk Steve Schleicher.

Concerns: Privacy and civic groups, including Common Cause and America Votes, objected that private credit-bureau databases are built for credit-reporting, not elections, may contain inaccuracies, and have been subject to data breaches. Witnesses also flagged unequal effects on credit-invisible populations; a software engineer who testified said credit databases can generate false positives and repeated nuisance contact.

Outcome: After committee debate and testimony, the committee recorded a 6-5 vote against advancing the bill. Sponsors said they will continue discussions but the vote ends the bill in committee.

What to watch: Clerks and the Secretary of State may continue voluntary county-level pilots. The committee record shows both operational benefits in certain counties and significant reservations from privacy and civic groups.