Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Mast calls Mar-a-Lago intrusion an 'assassination attempt,' faults funding for Secret Service

House Committee on Foreign Affairs · February 22, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

In the interview Congressman Brian Mast characterized an overnight Mar-a-Lago incident as an assassination attempt, praised local sheriff's deputies and said Secret Service funding shortfalls tied to Department of Homeland Security appropriations put agents at risk, attributing the funding status to Democrats.

WASHINGTON — After an overnight intrusion at Mar-a-Lago, Congressman Brian Mast said he regarded the incident as an assassination attempt and criticized what he described as a lack of funding for protective services.

Asked about the episode, the host said a shooter had arrived at Mar-a-Lago armed with a shotgun and a gas can. Mast praised local law enforcement, saying, "We have the best possible sheriff's department anywhere across the country." He added that Secret Service agents are "working" despite funding issues and asserted that those funding shortfalls stem from Democrats not funding the Department of Homeland Security, a contention he presented as a cause of risk to agents.

When asked whether he believed the incident constituted an assassination attempt, Mast replied, "Absolutely. If somebody is coming to the president's home with a firearm, with a a gas can, with something incendiary or something explosive or anything else, you have to believe they have an intent to conduct an attack against the President of The United States Of America..." Mast framed the remark as an assessment of intent based on the items the intruder carried.

The interview did not include law-enforcement confirmation of motives, nor did it include a Secret Service statement. Mast's attribution of funding responsibility to a political party was presented as his assertion; the program did not present documentary evidence of the funding chain in the interview.