Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Insurance pool offers Sierra County $700,000; board to weigh reinvestment vs. return
Summary
Trindel representatives told the board the county is eligible for a $700,000 return-of-funds based on actuarial reserves. The board discussed using the money to shore up underfunded property coverage or leave it in the pool; finance committee will return recommendations before the annual decision window.
Trindel (the joint powers pooling authority) representatives told the Sierra County Board of Supervisors that the county has an available return-of-funds offer of $700,000 built up over several years of favorable loss experience.
Rachel Hartman, Trindel executive director, and senior analyst Jack Contos explained the pool structure: counties carry self-insured retentions (deductibles), a shared pooling layer, and excess coverage beyond the pool. Trindel evaluates reserves annually at a high confidence level and determines how much county equity can be returned without risking future claim obligations.
Jack Contos said Sierra County’s workers’ compensation program currently shows roughly $2 million in excess above required worker-comp reserves, and the county has historically transferred pool equity between programs (for example, moving general-liability equity into property or other underfunded programs). He recommended that before returning funds the county consider transferring a portion to strengthen the property insurance program, which Trindel staff said has been in a deficit in recent years.
Board members welcomed the offer but flagged timing and access limitations: Trindel returns are evaluated annually and a county can access equity only on Trindel’s annual schedule. The finance committee and county auditor will evaluate options, including parking funds with Trindel, transferring equity between county programs, or taking a cash return. The board asked staff to return with an explicit recommendation at the next meeting to meet Trindel’s decision timeline.
The presentation did not produce an immediate action; the board asked for detailed balance sheets and recommendations for how to allocate or access the $700,000 before a formal decision is made.
