Commission Backs Two Rezoning Recommendations and Directs Comprehensive Review of Commercial Zoning

Richland County Planning Commission · February 20, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission recommended approval of map amendment 26-002MA (approx. 19.83 acres at Wilson Boulevard to EMP), voted to direct staff to evaluate MU1/MU2/MU3/GC/RC zoning districts, and approved staff’s four recommendations to move the comprehensive plan toward a broader 'paint-stroke' future land-use map.

On Feb. 19 the Richland County Planning Commission forwarded map amendment 26-002MA to county council with a recommendation of approval and took two additional policy actions: it directed staff to evaluate commercial zoning districts (RC, MU1, MU2, MU3 and GC) and voted to move staff’s comprehensive-plan recommendations forward.

Staff introduced 26-002MA, a request by applicant Brad Shell to rezone approximately 19.83 acres at 10141 Wilson Boulevard from Homestead to EMP (employment). Brad Shell said the EMP designation would support a mix of retail, restaurant and service uses and noted a January town hall with Councilwoman Cooper. Commissioner Grady moved to recommend approval, citing adjacent general-commercial zoning and the parcel's future land-use context; the motion passed.

On the code update, staff (Bryce) reviewed a DNS committee motion asking planning commission to evaluate the MU2 corridor mixed-use district and identified a list of uses the committee suggested removing from MU2. Staff presented three options for commission scope (evaluate MU2 alone, MU1/2/3 together, or include GC). After discussion, the commission voted to direct staff to research RC, MU1, MU2, MU3 and GC districts and return findings to the commission, including a potential work session.

For the comprehensive plan, staff proposed four changes: (1) move from a parcel-based future land-use map to a broad "paint-stroke" map, (2) adopt place-type descriptions to provide implementation guidance, (3) adjust future-land-use boundaries to reflect public input, and (4) remove the place-type/zoning alignment table to preserve flexibility. The commission voted to send staff forward with those four recommendations and to return a fuller package before forwarding to county council.

Taken together, the votes advance multiple rezonings to county council and set a schedule for staff to return with a coordinated evaluation of commercial zoning and updated comp-plan materials.