Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
OKCPS schedules first guardrail monitoring report for March 9; board told it will appear on consent agenda
Summary
District staff told the board the first formal guardrail monitoring report (life skills plus three interim guardrails) will appear on the March 9 consent agenda; trustees were given the report format and invited to submit questions before the meeting.
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Oklahoma City Public Schools board was told Wednesday that the district——s first formal guardrail monitoring report will be placed on the March 9 consent agenda, and that trustees may pull the item for discussion.
Dr. Galloway, a district presenter, told the board that guardrail monitoring differs from monthly SMART-goal monitoring and is intended as an annual status report showing whether guardrails are "on track" or "off track," the underlying SMART goal, rationale and measurement approach. He said the March 9 consent agenda will include Guardrail No. 1 (life skills) and three interim guardrails: collaborative problem solving and project-based learning, classroom discussion, and a study skills toolkit.
Board members asked how the report will be handled in practice. Chair Paula Lewis said trustees should be able to ask strategic as well as tactical questions before the meeting; Dr. Galloway confirmed staff will attach the technical document to the draft agenda and will add any board questions to the packet. He also clarified that guardrail monitoring does not count toward the district——s 50% student-outcomes monthly monitoring total because guardrails are not SMART student-outcome goals.
Staff described the report format that will accompany the consent item: the specific SMART goal the interim guardrail is tied to, a brief rationale, a measurement narrative translating SMART-language into practice, initiative priorities and project phases, and an on-track/off-track label. Trustees were told they can pull the consent item for discussion if they want deliberation beyond the consent format.
The board did not take a vote on the monitoring framework itself at the session. The next procedural step is the appearance of the guardrail monitoring item on the March 9 consent agenda; trustees and members of the public will be able to review the technical document once the draft agenda is posted.

