Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Drive Through topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Crystal Lake council delays decision on Dunkin' drive‑through after residents raise traffic and safety concerns
Summary
After extensive public comment and council questioning about traffic, school bus pick‑ups and proximity to residences, the Crystal Lake City Council voted to continue consideration of a Dunkin' drive‑through proposal at the Route 14/Lakeshore Drive site until Jan. 20 to allow further study and neighbor‑petitioner talks.
The Crystal Lake City Council on Dec. 2 agreed to continue action on a special‑use permit and zoning variations for a proposed Dunkin' drive‑through at a site on Route 14/Lakeshore Drive, after residents and council members raised concerns about traffic, school‑time safety and the site's small footprint.
Staff and public works engineers told the council the project is expected to generate about 89–90 trips during the morning peak hour (roughly 45 inbound and 44 outbound), with an estimated increase of about 20 additional trips per hour on the Lakeshore Drive block between Pearson and Route 14 during the busiest hour. Mike Magnuson, the city's director of public works and engineering, noted that the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) controls access on US Route 14 and could require closure or conversion of driveways, which would affect site circulation and may force plan revisions.
The applicant, Sumish Parikh, who said he grew up in Crystal Lake and owns local Dunkin' locations, told the council he designed the proposal as a drive‑through‑only operation to limit on‑site parking and seating impacts, and pledged to work with staff on mitigation measures. "We want to be good neighbors," Parikh said, describing planned noise abatement fencing, a modest trash enclosure built to mimic the building aesthetic and operational measures such as staffing adjustments during special promotions.
Multiple neighbors urged denial or relocation of the use. Tanner Farring, a Lakeshore Drive resident, told the council he was "100% against this drive through," citing the neighborhood's pedestrian character and two existing Dunkin' locations in town. Tom Sweeten and other residents warned that school bus drop‑offs and students walking near Lakeshore and Pearson increase the safety stakes during peak hours; several speakers said drivers would use side streets to avoid delays at the Route 14 signal, exacerbating neighborhood cut‑through traffic.
Supporters included a Dunkin' employee who said local franchisees and staff are community members and pointed to charitable giving, adding, "Every 30¢ of every dollar we make goes back right to this community." The applicant also presented data and operations practices—mobile ordering, targeted staffing during peak times and experience managing special events—intended to limit backups.
Council members explored mitigation options ranging from restricting the Lakeshore entrance, temporary traffic enforcement during an initial period at the applicant's expense, and signage limiting turns. Several council members said they would like an IDOT access determination before final action but acknowledged IDOT typically reviews access only after municipal zoning decisions are in place.
Outcome: Councilmember Speaker 5 moved and Speaker 8 seconded a motion to continue the petitioner's request to the Jan. 20 council meeting to give the petitioner and neighbors time to meet and for staff to consult further with IDOT. The motion passed by roll call vote.
Next steps: The council asked staff to coordinate a meeting between the petitioner and neighborhood representatives, to request preliminary input from IDOT about likely access requirements, and to return the item for council consideration on Jan. 20.
Votes and formal action: The council's continuation motion (to Jan. 20) passed by roll call on Dec. 2.
