Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Retirement Study Council votes to hire PTA/KMS/Bolton for PERS actuarial audit

Retirement Study Council · February 12, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Retirement Study Council voted unanimously to hire PTA/KMS/Bolton to conduct the PERS actuarial audit after staff recommended the firm’s methodology best matched the RSC’s October RFP; the council recorded an 8–0 vote in favor.

The Retirement Study Council voted to select PTA/KMS/Bolton to conduct the PERS actuarial audit and directed staff to engage the firm immediately.

An unidentified council member told members the ORSC received four proposals in response to a October request for proposals and said two — PTA/KMS/Bolton and Chiron — were substantially superior. The presentation noted Chiron’s not-to-exceed price at $115,400 and PTA/KMS/Bolton’s at $129,000, but the presenter said PTA/KMS/Bolton’s proposed methodology, work product and timeline “exactly” matched what the RSC outlined in the RFP. “With that, mister chairman, I move the ORSC select PTA slash KMS slash Bolton to conduct the PERS actuarial audit and direct ORSC staff to engage forthwith,” the member said.

A presiding member seconded the motion. The director called the roll for a recorded vote; members responded yes and the director announced the motion carried. The recorded roll-call entries show unanimous support (8 yes, 0 no, 0 abstain). The council did not receive any substantive questions before the vote.

Why it matters: The actuarial audit will review PERS practices, assumptions and valuation methods used to measure liabilities and set contribution and benefit metrics. Council members emphasized selecting a vendor that follows the RSC’s requested scope and timeline.

What happens next: ORSC staff were directed to engage PTA/KMS/Bolton promptly under the terms outlined in the RFP; the council did not specify a contract number, timetable for work products, or an explicit completion date during the meeting.