Citizen Portal
Sign In

Engineer describes how calibrated LSPC models inform watershed planning, TMDL work and climate scenarios

State Water Resources Control Board · February 24, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Manushipal, a water-resources control engineer, summarized how calibrated LSPC hydrological models can simulate flows, pollutant loads, reservoir operations and climate- or land-use scenarios to support TMDL development, drought planning and stakeholder engagement; he reviewed several case studies and directed listeners to EPA resources.

Manushipal, a water-resources control engineer, outlined how calibrated LSPC hydrological models can support watershed planning, total maximum daily load (TMDL) development, reservoir operations and scenario testing for climate and land-use change.

He said a calibrated model “ensures that simulation results closely match with real world conditions,” and described LSPC’s capacity to combine hydrology, hydrodynamics and biogeochemistry to track pollutant sources and evaluate best-management practices. “The LSPC model can include both point source and non point source pollutions to evaluate water quality in rivers, lakes, and other water bodies,” he added.

Why it matters: Local and regional water managers use calibrated models to estimate flows and pollutant loading, test reservoir-release options, assess flood risk and inform ecological-flow decisions. Manushipal emphasized that calibration is the foundation for reliable scenario testing, including future climate and land-use projections.

He reviewed specific capabilities and integration options. LSPC can be linked with MODFLOW to improve understanding of surface–groundwater interactions, which is important for aquifer management and long-term supply planning. Adding field-scale cropping information improves agricultural water-use estimates. He noted that the models can simulate reservoir storage and release timing to analyze downstream impacts under extreme events.

Case studies cited: an LSPC application in the Lower Grand River watershed (Ohio) used precipitation and temperature data and hydrologic response units (HRUs) based on land use and soils to simulate flows for TMDL development; a Taunton River Basin (Massachusetts) study evaluated cumulative future land-use and climate impacts on stormwater-control measures; a Lake Tahoe application used downscaled climate projections to simulate snowpack, streamflow and transport of sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus; and a regional freshwater-planning tool in Auckland, New Zealand used LSPC as a core modeling component to inform planners and stakeholders.

On outreach and next steps, Manushipal recommended EPA publications for technical reference and said additional materials and upcoming events will be posted to the project website. He encouraged listeners to subscribe to an email list and invited follow-up questions or materials.

The presentation ended with an offer to be contacted for follow-up and an assurance that supplementary materials will be posted online.