Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

CARB defends Cap and Invest amendments as lawmakers press on utility credits, industrial allocation and timing

Joint Legislative Committee on Climate Change Policies (California Legislature) · February 23, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a joint legislative hearing, California Air Resources Board officials outlined proposed amendments to the Cap and Invest program, defended a May rulemaking timeline and invited comments on utility allowance reallocations, industrial leakage safeguards and placeholder language for carbon removal; stakeholders urged faster action or warned of rate and leakage risks.

The California Air Resources Board on Wednesday presented proposed amendments to the state’s Cap and Invest program — the rebranded cap-and-trade system — and defended a schedule intended to finalize the regulation this spring while inviting additional public comment.

Chair Sanchez and Deputy Executive Officer Reginder Sahota told the joint legislative committee the amendments implement parts of the reauthorization bills (referred to in the hearing as AB 12 o 7 and SB 8 40) and aim to reduce emissions through 2045 while protecting affordability. “Formally known as cap and trade, the cap and invest program is a cost effective policy tool that makes polluters pay while reducing climate emissions over time,” a CARB official said during the presentation.

CARB staff summarized technical changes in the draft rule: retiring allowances when offsets are used for compliance, adding post-2030 allowances to the price containment reserve, updating reporting requirements to guard against market manipulation, and transferring free allowances from natural gas utilities toward electric utilities to support electrification and utility-bill affordability. CARB said the draft includes placeholder language recognizing carbon capture and removal (CCUS/CDR) as potential compliance pathways while separate SB 905…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans