Citizen Portal
Sign In

BOERNE ISD board votes to proceed on Aquatics Learning Center change order

BOERNE ISD board · February 17, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Feb. 2 special meeting, the BOERNE ISD board voted by voice to "proceed as discussed in closed session" on a proposed change order for the Aquatics Learning Center contract; the motion was moved and seconded and the presiding officer announced the motion carried. The transcript records a voice vote but no roll-call tally.

At a Feb. 2 special meeting, the BOERNE ISD board voted to proceed on a proposed change order for the Aquatics Learning Center contract after a closed‑session consultation with legal counsel.

During open session the presiding officer read the agenda item asking the board to consider action on the contract and proposed change orders. An attendee moved "that we proceed as discussed in closed session," which the presiding officer recorded as a motion from "Courtney daughter Bruce" and noted a second from Sarah Falconberry. The presiding officer called for the ayes and nays and then stated, "Motion carries." The transcript records a voice vote; it does not contain a roll-call tally or a written vote record.

Board members had convened earlier for a closed session under Texas Code §§551.071 and 551.129 to consult with legal counsel regarding the contract status and proposed change orders for the Aquatics Learning Center project. The motion taken in open session endorses the approach reached in that closed session, according to the board's recorded action.

The meeting also included other agenda items and a budget workshop; no public commentators were signed up for the meeting. The board's formal minutes should be consulted for a complete, itemized record and any details about the change order language and contractual impact, as the voice‑vote record in the transcript does not include the precise tally or the final contract text.