Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the SCAP And SB54 topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County executive clarifies SCAP and SB 54 but public calls for screening of program participation

Marin County Board of Supervisors · January 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Following public comments pressing the board to address the county's participation in SCAP, County Executive Derek clarified SCAP is an administrative reimbursement program and reiterated the sheriff's obligation under SB 54 (California Values Act); speakers urged the board to consider terminating participation or adding transparency.

Public speakers urged the Board of Supervisors to reconsider Marin County’s participation in the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAP) and to place the matter on a future agenda. Some commenters linked SCAP funding to broader concerns about immigration enforcement.

County Executive Derek responded during the county executive report by distinguishing county policy from federal immigration enforcement and by clarifying SCAP’s administrative role. He said the sheriff’s department "does not ask about immigration status" and reminded the public of the county's obligations under SB 54 (the California Values Act). Derek characterized SCAP as "a long standing administrative reimbursement program" that offsets certain jail costs months after incarceration and "does not involve immigration enforcement." He said staff are preparing additional information for the community and an upcoming hearing on Truth Act transparency.

Public commenters remained skeptical. One commenter said the public-records response from the Marin County Employees’ Retirement Association raised questions about investment choices; others said ending county participation in SCAP should be considered. The board did not vote on SCAP participation at the meeting but acknowledged requests to include the topic in future budget or policy workshops.

The county said it will circulate additional information and that a Truth Act forum is scheduled to provide greater transparency and oversight.