Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pensions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Yavapai County approves $4.5 million payment to address public‑safety pension shortfall after heated debate
Summary
The Board of Supervisors voted 4–1 Jan. 21 to move $4.5 million to make an additional payment to public‑safety retirement plans (PSPRS). One supervisor opposed, saying PSPRS needs more transparency and better management before accepting more funds.
The Yavapai County Board of Supervisors voted 4–1 on Jan. 21 to transfer $4,500,000 from budget capacity into accounts for the county’s public‑safety retirement plans to reduce unfunded liabilities.
County Manager Phil Borden told the board the payment is an "additional payment" on top of annual contributions intended to address unfunded liability in the sheriff/deputies and corrections officers plans. Finance staff later provided figures the board used in deliberations: the sheriff's/deputies plan unfunded liability was cited at about $22,000,751 and the corrections plan at $12,520,000, for a total of roughly $36.7 million across the county’s plans.
The motion drew objections from one supervisor, who said during debate that PSPRS representatives had "dodged questions" during an earlier presentation and urged more accountability before sending more money. The supervisor asked for clearer information on PSPRS’s expected rate of return and for assurances that county payments would be managed transparently.
Borden responded that the county has seen improvements under new PSPRS management, noted a recently appointed local trustee and outlined alternatives the board could consider in future (including bonding or other pay‑down strategies). He said the county’s current approach has been to make annual additional payments while pursuing other oversight measures.
After discussion, the board moved and seconded the item. The Clerk recorded a 4–1 vote to approve the $4.5 million allocation to the public‑safety retirement accounts; one supervisor voted no.
The decision does not change statutory contribution obligations; board members said it represents a county strategy to reduce actuarial unfunded liability over the amortization schedule. County staff said additional pension policy material will appear on the Feb. 5 agenda for further review.
The board did not adopt any new conditions on how PSPRS must invest the funds as part of this motion; supervisors who pressed for greater oversight said they would bring further proposals and requests for outside expertise to future meetings.
