Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission Recommends City Council Approve Triangle Development Agreement
Summary
The Murrieta Planning Commission voted to recommend City Council approval of a development agreement for the Triangle project, finding it consistent with the 2024 SEIR addendum and approving a resolution that forwards a 10‑year vested rights contract and associated public‑improvement commitments.
The Murrieta Planning Commission on April 23 recommended that the City Council approve a development agreement for the Triangle project, a multi‑phase retail development on the former Murrieta Springs Mall site.
Development Services Director David Chantaransu told commissioners the site’s specific plan dates to 1990 and was rebranded as the Triangle in 2013, and that the current agreement would vest land‑use rights for a 10‑year period. He said the agreement can secure public benefits such as off‑site street improvements, development impact fee credits and a revenue‑sharing arrangement tied to possible digital billboard conversions. According to the staff report and the environmental document, the project’s environmental review was updated in 2024 and the staff asked the commission to find the development agreement consistent with that addendum (State Clearinghouse No. 2008061104).
Commissioners focused questions on traffic and construction timing. A Public Works CIP engineer told the commission crews for a related Hot Springs widening would be on site ‘‘within 2 weeks’’ and that the work would start with day shifts on the south side and continue for about nine months. Chantaransu said the updated traffic analysis used peak‑period measures and concluded traffic peaks improved in some areas because of prior signal‑timing and roadway changes.
Staff also told the commission the EIR addendum and project documents identify 1,675 parking spaces in the project’s environmental report. On off‑site improvements, staff said the developer will make a best effort to privately acquire right‑of‑way for intersection widening and, if acquisition fails, the city may use eminent‑domain authority to secure property needed for public street improvements.
No members of the public spoke on the item. The commission moved to forward a resolution recommending Council approve the development agreement and to find consistency with the 2024 SEIR addendum. The motion passed with Vice Chair Wojciech recused, recorded as 3‑0 with one recusal.
The City Council will receive the commission’s recommendation along with the development agreement, the 2024 SEIR addendum and the proposed resolution for final action.
