Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Agreement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Murrieta council introduces development agreement for 64-acre 'Shops at the Triangle' project
Summary
The Murrieta City Council on Sept. 2 introduced an ordinance to approve a 10‑year development agreement for the "Shops at the Triangle," a 64.3‑acre retail project along Murrieta Hot Springs Road, authorizing land‑use certainty and provisions for off‑site street improvements and billboard relocations; the motion passed unanimously (4‑0) on first reading.
Get email alerts on the Development Agreement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Murrieta City Council on Sept. 2 introduced an ordinance approving a development agreement to enable construction of the "Shops at the Triangle," a proposed retail project on roughly 64.3 acres south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road between Interstates 15 and 215.
Planning staff told the council the agreement creates a 10‑year vesting period that gives the developer a decade of land‑use certainty and sets conditions for public benefits and infrastructure. Staff said the contract would assist with off‑site land acquisition for road realignment and street improvements (identified in sections 3.8 and 3.9 of the draft agreement), provide development‑impact‑fee credits, require annual progress monitoring, and include insurance and indemnification provisions to protect the city in the event of litigation.
Staff also described a provision allowing the conversion and relocation of two static billboards on I‑15 to digital signs under a later relocation agreement. Planners said the first phase would develop about 279,000 square feet of retail and restaurant pads along Murrieta Hot Springs Road and larger inline shop anchors on the southern portion of the site; the overall site was presented as about 64 acres with additional acreage reserved for a later phase.
After the presentation, no public speakers addressed the project. Council Member Stone moved to introduce the ordinance and Council Member DeForest seconded. The council voted unanimously (4‑0) to introduce the ordinance on first reading; the action does not adopt the final ordinance but advances the development agreement process to subsequent hearings and readings.
Why it matters: The development agreement will lock in development standards, a vesting period and obligations for infrastructure and off‑site improvements. If the council approves the agreement in subsequent readings, the project would move into entitlement and construction phases that could materially alter traffic patterns, commercial land use and the city’s capital improvement priorities.
Next steps: Staff said the development agreement will return for later hearings and that annual monitoring reports will be provided to council to track progress.

