Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the MFR45 Density topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners question realism and community benefits of proposed MFR‑45 high‑density zone
Summary
The Planning Commission reviewed visuals for a proposed MFR‑45 (45 units/acre) zone, with members raising infrastructure, parking, fire‑code and affordability concerns and asking staff to follow up with proponents for justification and feasibility.
Commissioners reviewed an MFR‑45 concept that would allow up to 45 dwelling units per acre and looked at example images from other Utah jurisdictions. Staff (Speaker 8) presented visual examples and cautioned that achieving 45 units/acre typically requires parking structures or underground parking that increase costs and may erode affordability.
Several commissioners expressed skepticism that 45 units/acre is practical in Grand County. Speaker 9 said the density level "seems just exponential" and warned the county should not rewrite land‑use code to fit a single developer. Speaker 2 observed that on many local projects infrastructure constraints — roads, drainage, and fire access — keep realized densities well below theoretical maximums and said existing projects have not reached 45 units/acre.
Discussion focused on whether density bonuses should be tied to community benefits such as deed‑restricted affordable ownership or other public benefits. Speaker 5 urged the commission to prioritize pathways to ownership rather than permanent rental stock at scale.
Chair (Speaker 3) and staff agreed to follow up: staff will contact the project proponents (identified in the meeting as Brian/Bridal/Developer) to determine the driving need and feasibility, and to report back at a future meeting. Commissioners did not adopt MFR‑45 text or map locations at this meeting; they recommended additional community input, infrastructure analysis and targeted siting near major arterials if higher density is pursued.
