Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Charter Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee begins multi-item review of standing procedural rules and Charter Review recommendations; staff to draft clarifications and package changes
Summary
DeKalb County’s operations committee reviewed 21 proposed rule and charter amendments, reached consensus on several technical items (including 'advise' vs 'direct' language for chief-of-staff interactions), debated night committee timing and the CEO's authority to reorganize departments, and asked legal and administration staff to prepare consolidated draft language for future votes and possible referendum review.
The operations committee began a section-by-section review of proposed standing procedural rules and recommendations from the Charter Review Commission. Staff said the package contains 21 items: a few had committee consensus while most would require further discussion.
Committee members agreed to retain language that commissioners should 'advise'—rather than 'direct'—the chief of staff, removing that item from the list of items requiring further debate. Commissioners debated the format and timing of 'committee of the whole' night meetings, with proposals ranging from a town-hall public-comment format to a 30-minute comment window beginning at 6:30 p.m.; the committee landed on 30 minutes as a compromise for traveling residents.
The committee considered language clarifying deputy-presiding-officer duties when the presiding officer leaves the floor and reached consensus to keep existing language rather than add the proposed clarification (staff said Robert's Rules already covers the practice). Commissioners asked legal staff to draft clarified text for when newly elected presiding officers assume duties; the committee agreed the newly elected officers should begin duties at the end of the meeting at which they were elected, and staff will prepare clarified language.
Madam CEO briefed the committee on the Charter Review Commission’s work (20 meetings and six public hearings) and recommended updates on procurement and budget timing. The CEO said the county has engaged the National Institute of Government Procurement (NIGP) for a procurement policy review and urged caution about giving individual commissioners subpoena authority; she raised concerns about recommendations to assign appointment-tracking to the COO rather than the county clerk.
Commissioners debated whether the CEO should require Board approval (via resolution) to create, consolidate or abolish departments. Several commissioners proposed a supermajority safeguard (for example, five votes) to overturn such changes; legal staff cautioned that changes to the distribution of powers could require state-level action or a referendum. The committee asked legal staff to identify which proposed items are home-rule changes the county can make itself and which would require legislative action or referral to a public vote.
The committee scheduled follow-up work: staff will prepare a consolidated package of recommended changes, draft clarified language on elections/presiding-officer transitions and provide a list of items that would require referendum or state action. The committee expected to revisit remaining items and take them to the Board of Commissioners at a future meeting (Nov. 18 referenced as a target for some items).
