Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Floyd Lamb Park topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic Preservation Commission approves final Floyd Lamb Park (Tule Springs) historical report
Summary
The Las Vegas Historic Preservation Commission approved the final historical report for Floyd Lamb Park at Tule Springs and agreed to handle two implementation recommendations (National Register amendment and sign improvements) as future agenda items.
Get email alerts on the Floyd Lamb Park topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Las Vegas Historic Preservation Commission on Feb. 25 approved the final historical report for Floyd Lamb Park at Tule Springs, 9200 Tule Springs Road in Ward 6.
The report — presented by Dr. Sebring of the Community Development Department — was the product of two draft rounds and staff responses to public and commissioner feedback. "We did have the two rounds of the drafts for this product," Dr. Sebring said, adding that the consultant who prepared the presentation was participating remotely.
Commissioners focused questions on two recommendations in the report (page 94): (1) an amended National Register of Historic Places nomination for the site and (2) updates or replacements for the park’s interpretive signs, some of which have deteriorated from exposure. Dr. Sebring told commissioners they were being asked to approve the report itself at today’s meeting and that the two recommendations would be addressed in future agenda items: "You're just approving the report, not recommendations," he said, adding that staff is already coordinating with Parks and Public Works to get quotes for sign replacement and will bring implementation proposals to the commission.
Commissioner Stodle moved to approve the final report; the motion passed in a voice vote with the chair also voting in favor. The commission did not take immediate action on the two recommendations and instead directed staff to return with concrete proposals (an amended register nomination and a sign program) for later consideration.
Next steps listed by staff include drafting the amended National Register submission and obtaining cost estimates for sign replacement and content updates. Staff also committed to posting the report and a one-page summary on the commission’s website for public access.

