Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Nuclear Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee backs site‑readiness pilot to recruit small modular reactors, with $75 million in early-stage grants
Summary
Senate Bill 57 would authorize a nuclear site‑readiness pilot under the Kentucky Nuclear Energy Development Authority to fund up to three projects with up to $25 million each ($75 million total) for permitting and pre-construction activities; sponsors said the program would attract small modular reactor developers and include surety bonds and PSC cost‑recovery safeguards.
Get email alerts on the Nuclear Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sen. Danny Carroll presented Senate Bill 57 to create a nuclear site‑readiness pilot under the Kentucky Nuclear Energy Development Authority that would fund up to three projects at up to $25 million each for early site permitting, licensing and pre-construction work for small modular reactors. Carroll said the $75 million target mirrors early site-permit costs and includes safeguards such as surety bonds and project milestones.
Carroll described public–private partnership expectations: utilities would likely apply for grants, partner with reactor developers and industry off-takers ("hyperscalers" such as major cloud providers), and bear construction costs if most energy output is contracted to a single private purchaser. The bill includes potential tax incentives and envisions PSC review of cost-recovery for amounts that benefit ratepayers.
Rodney Andrews (UK Center for Applied Energy Research) told the committee that meetings with developers X-energy and Kairos Power signaled that a readiness grant program would place Kentucky in consideration for projects. Angie Hatton (Public Service Commission) said the PSC has conducted exploratory work and framed nuclear as reliable but expensive, making a targeted readiness program a pragmatic starting point.
The committee adopted the substitute and recorded 11 aye votes and no nays; sponsors noted additional proposed funding to support NEDA grants and urged careful project controls and surety requirements.

