Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Airport Improvement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Platteville council approves petition seeking airport improvement aid
Summary
The Platteville Common Council approved Resolution 24-08 to petition the Secretary of Transportation to place the city’s airport projects on a state/federal funding list. Staff and the airport commission emphasized the petition merely preserves eligibility and that any project would require FAA approval and later council review.
Get email alerts on the Airport Improvement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Platteville Common Council on an affirmative roll-call vote approved Resolution 24-08, authorizing a petition to the Secretary of Transportation to seek airport improvement aid.
Staff said the airport commission completed long-range planning that identified a list of potential future projects. The petition places those projects in line for state and federal funding but does not obligate the city to build them; any specific project would require subsequent review by the planning commission, FAA approvals where required, and a separate council decision.
Bill Kloster, chairman of the airport commission, told the council many items on the list are speculative and described the constraints for major items such as runway extensions, including FAA traffic thresholds, possible land purchase, road rerouting and large fill needs. Kloster said a runway extension would be a large undertaking — “at least $5,000,000” — and stressed the city would need to demonstrate traffic thresholds to the FAA before such a project could move forward.
Council members asked practical questions about airport operations. Kloster said helicopters occasionally use the airport but none are permanently based there and that both piston (100LL) and turbine (jet) fuels are used depending on aircraft. He also described an effort by a private individual to form a flying club that could provide flight training if established.
The council closed the public hearing and then voted to approve the petition; the chair recorded the motion as carrying. No project-specific funding or construction was approved during the meeting; the vote authorizes only submission of the petition to preserve the city’s eligibility for future aid.

