Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Redevelopment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves multiple brownfield amendments and a bond step for Beacon Hill redevelopment
Summary
The commission approved Brownfield plan activations for 443 Sheldon and Powers Place, including affordable unit set-asides, and approved a project plan resolution enabling bond issuance for the $190 million Beacon Hill retirement-community redevelopment.
Grand Rapids commissioners approved several redevelopment items on the agenda, including Brownfield plan activations and a procedural step to allow bond issuance for a large-scale retirement-community project.
Staff presented a Brownfield activation for 443 Sheldon (Wealthy and Division), describing a new all-electric, solar building with roughly 26 apartments and 13 parking spaces; staff noted six units are anticipated to be restricted at or below 60% of area median income (AMI). The commission acted on that item after staff said it had been considered previously.
The commission also approved a Brownfield development plan amendment for Powers Place (764 and 800 Powers), an infill project to build eight townhomes, with one unit restricted at or below 100% AMI. Staff recorded total project costs of $2,700,000 and stated that roughly $1.1 million of that cost is categorized as housing TIF-eligible activity.
In a separate action, commissioners approved a resolution related to a project plan and issuance of bonds for the Beacon Hill retirement community redevelopment. Staff described the project as approximately $190 million in private investment to expand and renovate the retirement community near Boston and Plymouth, with about 149 units across rehabilitation and new construction. Staff emphasized that the city's action is a procedural step required before the economic development corporation will issue final bonds.
Why it matters: The Brownfield actions and the Beacon Hill procedural approval advance housing and redevelopment projects that include both market and income-restricted units and rely on tax-increment financing and bond mechanisms. Commissioners noted prior consideration of these items and asked procedural and financing questions before voting.
What happens next: Staff will proceed with the implementation steps described (economic development corporation review for Beacon Hill; construction and TIF administration for Brownfield projects). Commissioners requested follow-up and said they will monitor affordability commitments and project financing as projects move toward construction.
