Advocates Urge Study of DCF Practices and Expanded Post‑Secondary Supports for Youth in Care
Loading...
Summary
Witnesses supported SB264 directing a study of Department of Children and Families policies and HB 5,270 to extend post‑secondary tuition supports for youth formerly in DCF care, recommending independent oversight, lived‑experience participation and expanded supports beyond tuition.
The committee heard testimony urging a systematic review of Department of Children and Families policies and stronger supports for youth aging out of foster care.
Kelsey Elizabeth Matthews, a social‑work student and advocate, urged transparency and an independent review panel to avoid conflicts of interest and ensure DCF accountability. Sarah Egan of the Center for Children's Advocacy and Dr. Emily Knox of Connecticut Voices for Children stressed that additional staff for the Office of the Child Advocate (HB 5,271) and extended tuition assistance (HB 5,270) would help young people complete post‑secondary credentials. Dr. Knox cited national evidence that degree completion timelines frequently exceed traditional windows and recommended extending eligibility windows for tuition supports from age 21/23 to 26/28.
Witnesses also recommended that any study include people with lived experience, concrete reporting requirements and measurable outcomes (timelines, oversight, and clear decision frameworks) so recommendations translate into action. Several members asked for examples of actionable metrics and how the child‑advocate office could track outcomes across agencies.
No vote occurred; members signaled support for further drafting to ensure study independence and clarity on reporting and implementation mechanisms.
