Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Easements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves process for political subdivisions to assume abandoned canal easements
Summary
Second-substitute HB 3-63 would let municipalities or special districts file notice with the county recorder and affected landowners to assume prescriptive easements abandoned by canal companies; property owners get 120 days to object. The committee adopted the substitute and recommended the bill favorably with one recorded nay.
Representative Abbott presented HB 3-63, which creates a path for political subdivisions to take control of prescriptive easements when canal companies abandon canals. "When a canal company files an abandonment...a political subdivision can file a notice with the county recorder's office and send notice to the underlying owners and basically say we intend to take control of whatever prescriptive easement was held by that canal company," Abbott said.
The substitute spells out notice to adjoining or affected landowners and a 120-day objection window. Abbott and supporters said the bill cleans up title and preserves municipal ability to use canals for stormwater management or other public functions. Committee members and irrigation representatives pressed on questions of exchanges, historic irrigation use, whether this creates a de facto right of first refusal for municipalities, and how multi-jurisdiction canals are handled.
Irrigation company and county witnesses said many canal companies are mutual organizations that decline or cannot continue operations, leaving unmaintained canals; the bill provides a mechanism to clarify rights without preventing voluntary contractual arrangements. The League and special districts asked for clarity on dormancy/budget timing in later redevelopment conversation; Representative Ward moved adoption of the second substitute and the committee voted to recommend HB 3-63 favorably; Representative Walter recorded a nay on the final recommendation.
The substitute now moves forward with committee support; sponsors and stakeholders noted remaining technical areas to clarify around multi-jurisdictional canals and residential-owner impacts.
