Committee advances 'Selecting Neutral Accreditors Act' aimed at accreditor practices on DEI
Loading...
Summary
The committee advanced HB 3132, which would direct Oklahoma institutions to seek accrediting agencies focused on academic quality and to avoid agencies that enforced diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) mandates; sponsors said it protects academic standards, while opponents warned it could overreach into accreditation markets.
Representative Kevin West introduced House Bill 31‑32, called the Selecting Neutral Accreditors Act, saying accrediting agencies act as gatekeepers for colleges and universities and the bill encourages institutions to seek accreditors focused on academic quality rather than diversity, equity and inclusion mandates. "This bill ensures that Oklahoma institutions will seek to find accrediting agencies that focus on academic quality and institutional performance, not enforcing diversity, equity, and inclusion mandates," he said.
Members asked whether higher education institutions had been consulted and whether sufficient alternative accrediting agencies exist. Representative Lott said higher education officials had raised concerns that there may not be many accrediting agencies that fit the bill’s criteria and urged the sponsor to work with them. West pointed to a five‑year look‑back provision in the bill and a reporting mechanism that would allow institutions to continue with an accreditor if no suitable alternative exists.
Representative Waldron argued the market is already shifting and that the bill would add unnecessary government oversight. West and supporters said the provision is primarily a reporting/due‑diligence measure aligned with the governor’s executive order and intended to keep academic standards front and center.
After one minute each of rebuttal and defense, the committee voted to advance the bill and reported it as 'do pass.' No detailed vote tally was recorded in the transcript excerpt available.
