Study presented to Oregon House panel: short school year and high chronic absenteeism limit student progress, Echo Northwest modeling shows large NAEP gains if‑
Loading...
Summary
Stand for Children Oregon and Echo Northwest told the House Committee on Education that Oregon’s shorter school year (about 165 days on average) and ~33.5% chronic absenteeism are likely reducing literacy and math outcomes; the study models large NAEP ranking gains if districts move to 180 days and halve absenteeism over time.
Stand for Children Oregon and Echo Northwest told the Oregon House Committee on Education on Feb. 25 that the state’s shorter school year and unusually high chronic absenteeism have likely contributed to lower student achievement and wide disparities by district.
Sarah Pope, executive director of Stand for Children Oregon, summarized a statewide collection of bell-to-bell schedules and calendars used to estimate student contact and instructional time. "We have 24000 third graders who are not reading at grade level in this state," Pope said, and described Oregon as delivering roughly 165 student contact days on average versus a national average of about 180 days.
The report's modeling shows that if Oregon adopted a 180‑day calendar and cut chronic absenteeism roughly in half — to pre-pandemic levels — the state's ranking on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) for literacy would rise substantially after several years of sustained change. Pope said the model estimates literacy rankings could move from near the bottom of states to the top six after nine years of consistent intervention; math gains would be smaller but still meaningful.
Pope stressed the model's limits: it is a prediction based on existing research and "doesn't account for other investments that our state has recently made, for instance, in early literacy improvements," she said. The analysis differentiates teacher contract time, student contact time, and instructional time; Oregon’s administrative rules allow districts to count certain non-classroom hours toward instructional time (for example, recess allowances and up to 30 hours of professional development and 30 hours for parent‑teacher conferences), which Pope said can mask true in‑class learning time.
Representative April Dobson (R‑House District 39), a member of the committee, said the findings reinforce a need for legislative leadership. "Maintaining the status quo isn't an option," Dobson said, urging action to close loopholes and create early‑warning attendance systems. Committee members asked for additional district‑level data, which Stand for Children said it will release in March; Echo Northwest’s further work will cost options for different approaches, the presenters said.
Researchers and witnesses repeatedly framed the results as diagnostic rather than prescriptive. Sarah Pope said the study makes assumptions (for example, unchanged other investments) and that part two of the project will model costs for multiple options, including raising minimum hours, tightening attendance practices, or reducing allowed non‑instructional allowances.
The committee heard several technical clarifications: the NAEP sample represents public school enrollment and does not include private or homeschooled students; Oregon funds districts based on enrollment and average daily weights rather than daily attendance in the way some other states do; and Oregon has a 10‑day drop rule by which students absent 10 days may be removed from enrollment rolls, affecting funding.
The informational hearing closed without new legislation being adopted; presenters and the committee flagged additional follow‑up and a planned public release of the underlying district schedule data in March.
