Committee advances foster-care bill setting higher home-qualification standards, prompting questions about kinship and income thresholds
Loading...
Summary
A committee advanced a PCS aimed at raising foster-home standards (income and recommendation letters) but members warned income thresholds could exclude kinship placements; the sponsor said the measure seeks to improve long-term outcomes for children and invited further drafting.
Representative Williams presented a committee substitute for House Bill 33,44 aimed at improving foster-care placement standards and home conditions. "If we don't do something different, our results are not gonna change," Williams said, urging higher standards for prospective households.
The PCS would require minimum household income thresholds and two letters of recommendation from "respected and prominent individuals" for prospective foster caregivers. Representative Stinson and other members asked whether the measure applies to guardianship versus foster-care and whether the income test could exclude kinship placements that may be better for a child. The sponsor said kinship placements would have some flexibility but defended the income threshold as intended to raise household standards; he gave the example that for a three-person household the income threshold translated to roughly $27,000 a year.
Representative Rowe and others asked whether removing a felony disqualification (previously considered) was appropriate; Representative Ranson said removing felony language prevented chilling people from applying to be foster parents. Members asked staff and sponsors to refine language and consider practical impacts on placements in rural or low-income areas.
The committee voted 10 yeas and 2 nays to report HB 33,44 as a do-pass. The sponsor said he will continue to work with colleagues on protections for kinship placements and the bill's operational details before floor action.
