Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Splost Oversight topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Operations committee amends SPLOST 2 oversight resolution, forwards to full Board
Summary
Committee members added an oversight purpose for SPLOST 2 to review project timelines and goals, debated appointment rules and meeting procedures, and voted to advance the amended resolution to the Board of Commissioners for consideration July 8.
Get email alerts on the Splost Oversight topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The DeKalb County operations committee considered amendments to the SPLOST 2 residents review committee resolution and voted to forward the revised draft to the full Board for action at the next meeting. Commissioners agreed to add committee oversight of "how projects comply with the proposed timelines and goals outlined initially for that specific project," a change proposed after concerns about the animal shelter renovation and other schedule delays.
Commissioner Long Spears framed the amendment by citing the animal shelter renovation, originally allocated $7.5 million under SPLOST 2, and said portions of that allocation were used to fill funding gaps for overflow units and unexpected infrastructure costs. "So it's not 7.5," she said, arguing the oversight body should be empowered to advise on timelines and goal compliance so commissioners and appointees can flag delays.
Legal staff said the document had a problematic paragraph that would have made committee analysis a condition precedent to spending; that text was rewritten and highlighted so it is no longer a spending condition. Attorney Phillips told the committee alignment with the SPLOST referendum will depend on how the governing authority moves forward with spending and that staff will wordsmith dates and provisions before returning a final draft.
On procedural points, commissioners agreed that appointees should come from commissioners' districts (with CEO-appointed seats for the super-district commissioners) and discussed whether the committee should adopt standing commission rules or Robert's Rules of Order in applicable parts. The committee also requested the option to allow virtual meetings for inclement weather or other practical reasons.
After discussion and three friendly amendments, a motion to advance the resolution to the Board of Commissioners for the July 8 meeting passed by voice vote.
Next steps: Staff and the county attorney will provide a revised resolution that incorporates the discussed edits and an adjusted timeline for the committee's first meeting; the Board of Commissioners will consider the resolution at its next meeting.

