Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Sponsor says gutted building‑aid bill fails to address retroactive needs for small towns
Summary
Representative Michael Cahill urged rejection of the current HB 366, saying it was gutted and no longer implements his plan to set a $60 million minimum and allocate funds to retroactive needs for towns that missed earlier funding, citing Newmarket and Claremont as examples.
Representative Michael Cahill told the committee that HB 366, as presented, had been stripped of its substance. He said the original idea would have created a $60 million minimum annual spend on building aid and directed half of that toward new projects and half toward retroactive payments to communities that previously received inadequate assistance. “All it does is sort of…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
