Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Milton board reviews 12‑week Chromebook pilot; staff say Chromebooks meet most learning objectives
Summary
A joint technology and curriculum committee presented results from a 12‑week freshman Chromebook pilot: more than 90% of staff reported they could meet learning objectives on Chromebooks, with some assistive‑technology and curriculum compatibility issues noted; a final recommendation is expected after follow‑up.
The Milton School District joint technology and curriculum committee on Dec. 9 reviewed a 12‑week freshman Chromebook pilot and reported largely positive results.
Committee presenters said they surveyed about 63 high‑school teachers (roughly 40 of whom teach freshmen) and about 260 students. "All told, it was over 90% of our staff were able to meet their learning objectives," a committee member said, and roughly three‑quarters of freshmen teachers reported Chromebooks allowed them to deliver required course outcomes.
The committee noted tradeoffs. Some curriculum tools used previously on MacBooks (for example, Keynote or iMovie) are not available on Chromebooks, prompting staff to find alternate apps (Canva and others). Assistive‑technology needs were raised for a small number of students, particularly in special education and technology‑education classes; committee members said follow‑up support and training were provided for those teachers and students.
ClassWise, a classroom‑management tool, was described as a useful complement to the devices: "over 50% reported that they used it in their class and they noticed that it had a positive effect," the committee said. The committee also reviewed durability and cost signals: the MacBooks currently in use are older and have experienced higher breakage and repair volumes in recent cycles, while Chromebooks in the pilot were described as more ruggedized. Presenters said there were "more than 30" MacBook screen replacements in the review period and only a handful of Chromebook screen breakages among freshmen.
Committee members urged a careful total‑cost‑of‑ownership analysis before any district‑wide switch, spelling out repair, replacement and software‑license implications. The group said a full recommendation will follow after a subsequent committee meeting and additional costing figures are presented. Board members were encouraged to email questions to committee leads prior to that meeting.
Next steps: the committee will hold a follow‑up meeting (open to board members) to review cost models, unanswered questions and recommended training before making a formal recommendation to the full board.
