Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Early Childhood Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kansas committee considers bill requiring kindergarten students be 'toilet trained' with supports; school boards warn of harms
Summary
A House committee heard competing testimony on HB 2486, which would require parental written assurance that a child is toilet trained before kindergarten enrollment, set district policies, and exempt students with IEPs/504 plans or verified medical conditions. Proponents said the change protects instructional time and student dignity; opponents warned of exclusion risks, litigation and unfunded mandates.
The Committee on Education heard debate on House Bill 2486 on Wednesday, a proposal that would require school districts to obtain a written assurance from parents that a child is toilet trained before enrolling that child in kindergarten and to adopt procedures for handling children who are not.
Revisor Jason Long said the bill "provides that a school district cannot enroll a child in kindergarten if that child is not toilet trained" and would require "a written assurance from the child's parent that the child is toilet trained," while also creating district policies to determine when toileting incidents "impact the educational experience of the student or their peers." The measure includes explicit exemptions for students with an IEP, a 504 plan or a verified medical condition and defines what it means to be toilet trained.
Representative Brantley, who introduced an amendment to remove language on "removal and reintegration," told the committee the change is intended to put supports ahead of exclusion. "By setting a clear readiness expectation, while also establishing compassionate pathways for families who need help, we strengthen both student outcomes and classroom conditions," she said, urging trauma‑informed responses, referral to social workers and protection for children with disabilities.
Opponents, including Leah Fleider of the Kansas Association of School Boards, said the subject is an "intimate issue" best handled locally and warned the bill as written could permit districts to exclude children from kindergarten. "We oppose the bill as noted, in our written testimony," Fleider told the panel, saying widespread exclusion risks, potential litigation and an unfunded mandate are central concerns.
Members pressed proponents on how common the problem is and how districts currently handle toileting needs. Proponents and witnesses said practices vary widely by district; some rely on two‑adult protocols, pull‑ups or special education teams, while others may have limited staff resources. Revisor Long warned that a local school board policy to bar students could "potentially meet with some legal challenges and denial of a public education to a student."
Fiscal analysts at Legislative Research reported the Department of Education anticipates no state fiscal effect on school aid or agency administrative costs, while the Kansas Association of School Boards said enactment would increase district administrative costs but could not estimate an amount.
The committee received additional written testimony from Families Together, Children's Alliance of Kansas, Disability Rights Center of Kansas and the Kansas School Nurses Organization. The hearing was closed with no immediate vote; committee staff said the bill will be considered in future committee action.
The committee adjourned for the day after completing its scheduled items.
