Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Grants Cdbg topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Town briefed on CDBG outcomes; staff urges urgent-repair model for future rounds
Summary
Town staff reported the town was not selected for a recent CDBG cycle, completed three owner‑occupied rehabilitation projects from an earlier $750,000 grant, and recommended pursuing an 'urgent repair' approach in future applications to help more households amid rising construction costs.
Mr. Harris reported to the board that the town’s recent application to the Department of Commerce 2025 CDBG cycle was unsuccessful; only eight communities statewide were awarded funds in that competitive cycle and the town’s application competed in a limited pool. He reviewed the town’s ongoing CDBG activities from the earlier $750,000 award (2020), saying the program originally targeted 10 substantial owner‑occupied rehabilitation projects but completed three projects because construction costs and project-level compliance (including one property that failed flood-plain compliance) made the substantial‑rehab model difficult to administer.
Harris explained why the town is considering a programmatic shift: construction prices have increased substantially since COVID, making full-house rehabilitations costly and time-consuming; instead, he recommended an urgent-repair model with smaller per-household interventions (on the order of $10,000–$20,000) that could help more households and reduce the administrative and environmental hurdles that slowed prior projects.
Why it matters: The town used CDBG funds primarily to assist elderly and permanently disabled homeowners with accessibility modifications; program design shapes how many households can be helped and how quickly funds can be spent and closed out under grant timelines. Harris said the town expects to close out its current CDBG activity by early April and to finish required expenditures by February and that staff will continue to pursue appropriate future funding cycles using lessons learned.
Next steps: Staff will monitor future grant cycles, consider applying under an urgent‑repair model rather than substantial rehab, and prepare a full outcomes report for the board in April or May.
