Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bank Capital Requirements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
OCC proposes changing enhanced supplementary leverage ratio to early-warning buffer to ease lending pressure
Summary
An unnamed representative of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency outlined a proposal to modernize capital rules for the largest banks, converting the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio from a hard threshold into an early-warning buffer to preserve capital levels while allowing more lending flexibility.
An unidentified speaker from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency outlined a proposal to modernize capital requirements for the largest banks the agency supervises, saying the move would convert the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio from a hard regulatory threshold into an early-warning buffer.
The speaker said the current ratio "isn't working as the capital backstop it was designed to be" and has instead constrained large banks' ability to "lend or invest." The change, the speaker said, would create "a smarter, tailored approach" that sets requirements based on a bank's risk profile — including size, complexity and interconnectedness — rather than a one-size-fits-all standard.
Officials framed the proposal as a way to preserve the overall level of capital banks are expected to hold while allowing institutions to use that capital "more efficiently." "This provides large banks with additional flexibility and reduces the likelihood they would reduce lending or other activities during times of economic stress," the speaker said. The OCC encouraged stakeholders to review the proposal and submit comments, saying it "will carefully consider every comment as we finalize these rules."
The agency characterized the effort as aimed at supporting lending and economic growth, promoting fairer competition, and keeping the federal banking system "the strongest in the world." For more information, the speaker directed listeners to occ.gov.
The remarks in the transcript did not include numeric targets, draft regulatory text, a timeline for implementation, or details on supervisory calibration; those specifics were not specified in the transcript and would be expected to appear in the formal proposal published for comment.
