Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ems Reimbursement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves EMS reimbursement changes to allow treatment‑in‑place and limited alternative destinations
Summary
After stakeholder negotiations and three amendments clarifying definitions and limiting private‑insurer telehealth obligations, the committee voted 13–0 to send HB 10‑69 to Appropriations. The bill authorizes Medicaid reimbursement for EMS treatment‑in‑place, telehealth in the field, and transport to crisis stabilization units under defined conditions.
Representatives Stewart and Frey introduced legislation aimed at modernizing emergency medical services reimbursement so EMS can be paid for clinically appropriate treatment provided on scene and for transporting patients to a broader list of appropriate destinations.
Sponsors noted that under current rules EMS is typically reimbursed only when it transports patients to emergency departments; they cited a figure that roughly "40% of calls do not end in transport," arguing that the lack of reimbursement discourages treat‑in‑place models and drives unnecessary ED use. "This will allow emergency medical services to be reimbursed by health plans for medical care they provide to patients on scene," a sponsor told the committee.
Hospitals, insurers and EMS providers all testified. Health plans and hospitals supported the aim to reduce unnecessary ED visits but asked for clearer definitions and guardrails. Children's Hospital Colorado asked that commercial telemedicine coverage match the Medicaid approach to avoid duplicating work done in the field; health plans sought the ability to apply evidence‑based utilization review. EMS chiefs and providers described mobile integrated health programs and cost savings, including rural programs that avoid expensive transports and reduce ED boarding.
Sponsors worked with stakeholders and brought three amendments (L002, L006, L007) that narrowed definitions, limited private‑insurer telehealth obligations, clarified out‑of‑hospital service definitions (for Medicaid), and restricted alternate‑destination reimbursement to crisis stabilization units in certain circumstances. All three amendments passed. The committee voted 13–0 to send the amended bill to Appropriations.
Supporters estimate the measure could save millions annually by avoiding costly transports and unnecessary ED visits, while supporters and agencies agreed on the need to retain medical direction and scope‑of‑practice safeguards for EMS.
