Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Infill topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission adds triplexes as a secondary use in suburban neighborhoods
Summary
The Commission voted to list triplexes as a secondary use in the suburban place type to allow modest infill; staff recommended adding triplexes to "secondary" uses and commissioners debated ADUs, lot sizes and neighborhood character. The transcript records opposition from two commissioners.
The Whitefish Planning Commission voted to add triplexes to the list of secondary/allowed uses in the suburban neighborhood place type. The proposed change was presented as a modest way to increase housing options in widely suburban areas without broadly upzoning or changing core neighborhood character.
Commissioners and staff discussed implementation details: staff recommended placing triplexes in the "secondary uses" portion of the place-type description rather than listing them as a primary use, and Commissioners debated whether triplexes would effectively allow four units when combined with accessory dwelling units (ADUs). Commissioner 8 stated the motion as a tool to allow gentle infill: "A triplex is not a shocking thing in my opinion," and clarified the intention was to allow shared-plot infill while preserving street-scale character. The transcript records that Whitney and Scott opposed the addition; the Commission nonetheless adopted the change.
Staff noted that place-type language is descriptive and that any actual permissibility will be refined through zoning code updates; where local covenants or HOAs exist, private restrictions may still prevent such development.
Next steps: the change will be included in the transmittal to City Council; if Council and staff proceed with a zoning rewrite, the suburban place type language will inform the zoning standards that set lot coverage, frontage and other development standards.
