Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Monitoring Reports Superintendent Evaluation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mason County board finds superintendent in compliance with communication and discipline policies
Summary
After reviewing two monitoring reports, the Mason County School Board voted to find the superintendent’s performance in compliance with ER 9 (communication with the public) and ER 12 (student conduct and discipline); board members praised a new monitoring‑report format and discussed levy outreach and school safety items.
The Mason County School Board on Tuesday accepted two monitoring reports and voted to find the superintendent’s performance in compliance with ER 9, the policy on communication with the public, and ER 12, which covers student conduct and discipline.
An unnamed presenter (S4) opened the agenda item with two monitoring reports, describing a new report layout that places the board policy statement at the top and then breaks the policy into sub‑sections where superintendent interpretation and supporting data appear. “I changed the formatting on the monitoring reports, and this is the format I’ll use going forward,” the presenter said, describing the new structure and noting some spring reports will reflect the previous year.
Director Youngberg moved to find the superintendent in compliance with ER 9; the motion was seconded and, after advisory votes from student board representatives, the presiding official announced the motion carried. Director Krasner moved to find the superintendent in compliance with ER 12; that motion also passed after a second and advisory student input. The board did not record a roll‑call tally in the public portion of the transcript; the presiding official announced both findings of compliance.
Board members commended the format change and the district’s outreach work. Director Youngberg told colleagues she “love[d] every single part” of the new report layout and the level of detail it provides. Director Krasner praised the district’s communications and social media outreach, saying that parents and the community have noticed and that staff and volunteers are helping share classroom and extracurricular highlights.
The presenters and board members said the student conduct and discipline monitoring reflects building‑level improvement plans and behavioral supports such as PBIS (Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports). The district representative said there is still work to do but that trends are moving in a positive direction.
No policy revisions were scheduled this month. The board set a public study session for March 9 to review ER 9 and ER 12 and scheduled its next regular meeting for March 23 at 6:30 p.m. The meeting adjourned after brief “good of the order” remarks, which included updates on levy outreach and a campus safety incident that prompted a sheriff response but was not reported as an active threat.
What happens next: the board will revisit the monitoring reports during the March 9 study session and may consider any recommended changes following that discussion.
