Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Real Estate Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House Finance considers codifying 'fixture' and 'affixed' tests for REET
Summary
Senate Bill 6114 would place statutory definitions for 'fixture' and 'affixed' into the real-estate excise-tax statute to make determinations easier for taxpayers and county reviewers; Department of Revenue testified in support and said the bill codifies an observable test rather than changing outcomes.
Senate Bill 6114, heard Feb. 26 by the House Finance Committee, would add statutory definitions for 'fixture' and 'affixed' for state excise-tax (REET) purposes and replace the common-law three-prong fixture test with statutory criteria focused on documentation, intended function, and the difficulty of movement.
Committee staff said the change is intended to reduce taxpayer confusion, and the Department of Revenue (DOR) said the bill is a process-improvement measure that should not alter which items are classified as fixtures. Steve Ewing of DOR illustrated typical scenarios: a length of hose sitting on a shelf remains personal property, while an irrigation system buried and integrated with a property would be considered affixed. Conversely he said expensive copier-printers that are wheeled in and out of a building would generally remain personal property for REET purposes.
DOR answered members’ questions about retroactivity (the agency said the bill is not retroactive) and review practices at the county level, and emphasized that the bill aims to make determinations more observable and easier to administer.
The committee closed the hearing on SB 6114 at the conclusion of testimony and questions.
