Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Forest Lake City meeting deferred after members can’t join; memorial scheduling pushed
Summary
Attendees at a Forest Lake City meeting said insufficient in-person attendance and a member’s inability to log into Zoom left them unable to proceed; organizers discussed a special meeting, aligning an August memorial event with council approval, and how residents can submit comments.
Get email alerts on the Meeting Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a Forest Lake City meeting, organizers said they would defer action after several members could not attend in person and one member could not log into the meeting’s Zoom connection. Speaker 2 reported a member, Tim, had emailed that he “couldn’t log in,” and attendees concluded they did not have the in-person participation needed to proceed.
The inability to include a remote participant without announcing a public location complicated plans, Speaker 2 said: “With Tim being able to Zoom, we would have had to announce it and have him in a public spot.” Because of that requirement and the short notice, participants said the meeting would likely be canceled and the agenda pushed to the next month unless a special meeting is called.
Speakers discussed options and timing for rescheduling. Speaker 2 and others referred to an August timeline connected to a memorial event; both August 20 and August 22 were mentioned in the discussion but it was not clear which date would be the formal meeting or event date. Speaker 4 noted that whatever date is selected would still require approval by the council.
The group also discussed how absentee members or residents could provide input before the next meeting. Speaker 4 advised, “If you get the agenda for this one and the agenda for August, you can send a email to Kyle, and then he will give it to the, the chairperson, which was Karen tonight, but, otherwise, Don.” Several attendees said they would email comments rather than attend when they were out of town.
A separate thread of the meeting included informal public memories about a now-demolished clubhouse and the community’s former skating rink and bowling alley, with several speakers urging interest in finding investors for recreational facilities. Those remarks were presented as community recollection rather than formal agenda items.
Speaker 2 closed procedural discussion by restating the internal process: agenda items need commission review before advancing to the council for a vote. No formal motions or votes were recorded in the transcript provided. The group left the schedule unresolved pending whether a special meeting will be called or items will carry to the next regular meeting.

