Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Library Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Seguin ISD removes two challenged titles after committee review; board affirms amended recommendations 7–0

Seguin Independent School District Board of Trustees · February 25, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Following committee reviews under district policy and Texas Education Code guidance, trustees voted unanimously to remove Bag of Bones and Push from high school library holdings while retaining Tilt; debate focused on 'pervasively vulgar' criteria and committee processes.

The Seguin ISD Board of Trustees voted unanimously to accept an amended recommendation from the library material challenge committee to remove two high‑school titles from the district catalog and retain a third.

Jackie Silvious presented the committee report, noting committees followed the district’s EFB(local) process and questions drawn from Texas Education Code §33.021. The committee recommended removing Bag of Bones (Stephen King) from the Seguin High School library. At trustees’ direction and after floor motions, the board amended the committee’s recommendation to also remove Push (Sapphire) and to retain Tilt (Ellen Hopkins). Trustee Joshua Bright moved the amended action; the board approved the amended recommendation 7–0.

Trustees discussed the committee’s evaluations in detail. Trustee Bright cited committee findings that certain materials met the district’s standard for being "pervasively vulgar," a label the committee reached by answering a series of policy questions about language and sexual content. "The committee members talked about what is vulgar to one person is the life experience of another," Jackie Silvious said, describing the deliberation process and noting the committee included librarians, a parent and other members who read the books and voted.

Some trustees asked for clearer committee procedures going forward, including allowing one‑book‑per‑committee reviews and an anonymous voting mechanism for committee members to reduce perceived peer pressure. The district said recordings and committee reports will remain on the district website and that board members may be provided printed or digital copies of challenged materials when time allows before meetings.

The board’s action formalizes the committee findings for the challenged titles but preserves the formal appeal pathway described by district policy, allowing further challenges and reviews if requested.