Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Midyear Progress topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Battle Creek Public Schools reports midyear gains, outlines targeted plans to address absenteeism and the middle-school belonging dip
Summary
District leaders told the board that midyear academic and attendance metrics show pockets of progress but uneven results; the district plans targeted interventions — including home visits, tiered academic supports and capacity-building pilots — to address chronic absenteeism and a drop in belonging in middle grades.
Battle Creek Public Schools administrators presented a midyear progress report Monday that showed measurable gains in several schools but also flagged continuing challenges with chronic absenteeism and a steep drop in student belonging during the middle-school transition.
"What we've committed to is over the course of 5 years of raising student proficiency in reading and math to 80% by July 1, 2031," the district's curriculum leader said during the presentation, describing annual "stair-step" benchmarks to track progress. The board packet lists the district student population at 3,385 and breaks down demographics used in planning.
Leaders told trustees the district is using a shortened belonging measure aligned to the My Student Voice instrument. Participation rose from 863 responses in spring to 1,615 in the fall for the grades the survey covers; the presentation cited a district belonging score of 51.8% for the measured component. Trustees pressed for clarity and were told the survey is administered to grades 4–12 and that the district will provide the instrument at a future work session.
Attendance and behavioral data drew sustained scrutiny. Staff described chronic absenteeism coding and said students who miss the equivalent of 10% of school days are flagged; Central and Springfield were named as buildings with higher chronic-absence rates. Presenters said belonging falls about 18 percentage points between grades 5 and 7, and that fairness and discipline themes surfaced in student responses.
To respond, the district outlined multiple actions: expanded de-escalation and crisis-prevention training for staff; home visits and attendance contracts for targeted families; student-led attendance teams at the high school; and increased family-engagement campaigns. District staff said they will monitor participation rates by school and use targeted cycles of support so interventions can be sustained after short-term pilots.
Academics remains a focus alongside attendance. The curriculum presentation described a three-tier intervention model (Tier 1 classroom instruction, Tier 2 targeted reteaching, Tier 3 intensive remediation) and said the district is contracting with a regional education organization to coach instructional leaders and accelerate implementation where needed.
Board members praised improvements in some schools and asked for richer disaggregation of results by demographics and school level. District leaders said that breakdowns are available and will be shared, and that they will continue monitoring midyear indicators to determine where to intensify supports.
The board received the midyear presentation in open session; no formal vote was required. The next procedural step described by trustees was a focused work session to review the belonging survey instrument and to receive updates on progress toward year-end benchmarks.
