Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parklets Outdoor Seating topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Select Board debates draft parklet ordinance and delays formal approval
Summary
The select board reviewed a draft ordinance to authorize converting public parking spaces for parklets and outdoor seating, raising safety, ADA, snow‑removal, insurance, notification, fee and timing concerns; members agreed not to adopt an ordinance that night and directed staff to collect formal proposals from businesses for interim seasonal decisions.
The Northfield Select Board opened an extended discussion about a draft ordinance to authorize conversion of public parking spaces for outdoor seating and parklets after Town Manager Jeff briefed the board on state open‑container law and examples of parklets used elsewhere.
Jeff told the board state law prohibits open containers in public places unless consumption is permitted by a restaurant’s liquor license or a specific outside‑consumption permit; restaurants with permits may allow alcohol within defined licensed areas. He referenced prior local parklet arrangements that used fencing to create a contained seating area.
Board members raised multiple points of substance. Technical and safety concerns included required protective barriers (Jersey barriers, reflective posts, wheel stops), finished surface and flush requirements for ADA access, and whether parklet owners should be explicitly responsible for adjacent snow removal. Members recommended replacing vague timelines such as “reasonable period” with a fixed deadline (one board member suggested 10 days) for repair or cleanup.
Several members suggested the ordinance should explicitly allow sidewalk dining as a related use or include it in a single document, and they recommended requiring liability insurance and notification to abutting businesses within a 150‑foot radius. One member proposed imposing a modest permit fee (suggested $50–$100+) to cover staff review time. Board members also discussed whether limits should be expressed as a raw number of spaces or as a percentage of total parking supply, and agreed more inventory and data are needed to set sensible caps.
Members noted timing constraints: an ordinance requires public notice and a public hearing and cannot be adopted the same night it is first discussed. Given the seasonal start of outdoor seating around June 1 and potential supply constraints, the board agreed staff should solicit written plans from the two businesses that have expressed interest (drawings/visuals and locations) and bring those proposals to the next meeting for interim, renewable seasonal approval while the formal ordinance is drafted and noticed.
No ordinance vote was taken. The board directed staff to collect formal proposals from businesses and to return with more detailed draft language, including clearer maintenance timelines, safety requirements, ADA compliance, insurance, notification procedures and a proposed fee structure.
