CERCAP rate study: Smithsburg’s systems show operating surpluses but major CIP would require significant rate increases; council asks for a water-loss audit

Smithsburg Town Council · February 17, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

CERCAP reported the town’s water system averaged roughly $434,000 net positive and sewer about $129,000 (2022–2024); a full capital program could require an ~83% water-rate increase. Council asked for a water‑loss audit and updated 2024 numbers.

Michael Harshrom, Maryland state lead for the Southeast Rural Community Assistance Project (CERCAP), presented a preliminary rate study that examined operating finances and modeled debt service for identified capital improvements.

Harshrom said the study found the water system averaged about a $434,000 net positive across 2022–2024 and the sewer system averaged about $129,000 over the same period. He warned that if the town financed the full scope of the engineering-identified capital projects using rates alone, water rates could increase by roughly 83% to cover annual debt service on that borrowing.

The consultant recommended further analysis before any rate change: a water‑loss audit to identify unaccounted water and metering issues, a customer‑class audit to evaluate tiering and commercial rates, and early discussions with USDA and EPA about grant/loan mixes. Harshrom noted industry targets for water loss are typically about 12–15% and said the town’s current losses were “hovering around 21 to 22 percent.”

Councilors asked whether reduced water loss or other operational changes were modeled; Harshrom said that preliminary draft had not included those scenarios but he could incorporate them in a revised report. Councilors agreed to request an explicit water‑loss audit and updated analysis using 2024 numbers, and to consider a commercial/customer tier to better align usage incentives.

Next steps: consultant to provide a revised draft with updated figures and to assist with potential grant and low‑interest loan applications; council and staff to evaluate water‑loss findings and integrate any recommendations into the FY27 budget and CIP planning.