Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Plan Approval topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board approves Cannon Dial Elm Club kitchen and dining expansion with parking variances and environmental conditions
Summary
The board granted preliminary and final site plan approval and two parking variances to the Cannon Dial Elm Club at 21 Prospect Avenue, approving a second‑floor kitchen/servery addition that adds about 45–50 seats, subject to conditions including dark‑sky lighting, bird‑safe glass or film, a construction cost estimate, and a landscape plan.
The Princeton Planning Board voted to approve preliminary and final major site plan application P2525‑692P for the Cannon (Canon) Dial Elm Club at 21 Prospect Avenue on Feb. 19, granting two parking‑related variances and a set of conditions recommended by staff and the Environmental Commission.
The club proposed a second‑floor addition of approximately 1,368 square feet above the loading area to expand kitchen, servery and dining room space, adding roughly 45–50 seats. "Currently, we're at about 215 members," Charles Friyer, chairman of the club’s graduate board, said during testimony. He explained the addition is designed to increase dining capacity while preserving staff parking and existing operational patterns.
Applicant engineer Russell Smith presented site plans and said the project preserves existing gravel parking (five spaces) and adds one accessible space for a total of six parking spaces on site; he and the applicant asked the board to grant two bulk variances related to parking counts and a parking setback. Smith said the club provides parking for staff only and that students typically walk or use university garages, and he argued the requested variances would not create a substantial detriment to the public good.
The Environmental Commission had sought dark‑sky compliant lighting for the loading area, a color temperature no greater than 3,000 Kelvin, bird‑safe glass or film for new windows to reduce bird collisions, and consideration of Energy Star appliances for new equipment. Architect Charles Chichester and the applicant team said they will investigate and accommodate those recommendations where practicable; the applicant committed to select lighting fixtures that meet dark‑sky standards for the loading area. The board’s approval carries explicit conditions requiring (1) a construction cost estimate from the applicant’s engineer, (2) use of bird‑safe glass or film on new windows or a demonstrably equivalent mitigation, (3) selection of loading‑area lighting that complies with dark‑sky standards and limits color temperature to ≤3,000K, and (4) submission of a landscape plan subject to staff or committee review (the applicant said horticultural improvements are planned in a later phase).
Board counsel read the conditions into the record and the board approved the application by roll call vote. Mr. Casey, representing the applicant, and the applicant team were present; staff confirmed required checklist waivers and advised that no additional county or state approvals were triggered by the scope of work as proposed.
What it means: The club can proceed with construction subject to municipal conditions; the variances recognize the unique operational context of university‑adjacent eating clubs where most undergraduates do not drive and staff parking is prioritized.
Next steps: The applicant will supply the construction cost estimate and final drawings reflecting the board’s conditions; the planning department will confirm compliance during permit review.
Direct quotes from the proceedings are taken from the board’s Feb. 19 transcript.
