Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Detention Center topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kent County commissioners vote to restore detention center operations after extended debate
Summary
After a lengthy public and staff discussion about staffing, overtime and the costs of outsourcing inmates, commissioners voted to return the county detention center to full operations and bring pilot inmates back to the facility; the board also scheduled a closed session to consider personnel reorganization.
A majority of the Kent County Board of Commissioners voted to restore full operations at the county detention center and bring pilot inmates back to the facility after a prolonged debate over staffing levels, overtime and the costs and risks of outsourcing inmates to neighboring counties.
The motion, moved and seconded during the meeting, directed staff to return the facility to full service and schedule a closed session to discuss personnel reorganization and oversight. Commissioners said they viewed recent reductions—from 28 positions to 21—as producing measurable savings but remained concerned about transport logistics, medical coverage and long-term bargaining power if the county eliminated in‑house capacity.
Pat, the county chief finance officer, briefed the board on three financial scenarios used to test the savings and costs of outsourcing. Pat said she recalculated the commissioner's estimate and told the board, "I think your calculations ... are probably correct," while also warning the figures depend on multiple unknowns: the future daily per‑diem rates charged by host counties, transportation and medical costs, and a still‑unfinalized staffing model. Pat presented models using a six‑month average inmate population of 36 and staffing plans that ranged down to 18 employees under a transport model, producing net savings that varied with per‑diem assumptions.
Sheriff Hickman and detention‑center management described operational risks, including increased transports in bad weather, coverage for suicidal or medical inmates, and overtime pressures when staff are unavailable. The sheriff and detention staff argued those operational considerations could raise costs or create public‑safety tradeoffs if the county relied wholly on outside facilities.
Commissioners acknowledged both the immediate savings from staff reductions and the uncertainties in a transport model that would reduce in‑county capacity. After deliberation the board voted to reinstate full operations and to revisit staffing and oversight in closed session.
The motion passed on an audible voice vote of the commissioners present. The board did not set immediate additional budget allocations at the meeting; commissioners said they will consider personnel and operational changes as part of the closed‑session deliberations and future budget work.
