Committee unanimously backs 'delayed death' prosecution exception after victim-family testimony
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
Lawmakers advanced first substitute SB 92, a narrow 'delayed death' exception to Utah's double-jeopardy prohibition that would allow homicide charges when a previous prosecution for serious bodily injury is followed by a later death caused by that injury; the bill received unanimous committee support after victim-family testimony and stakeholder vetting.
A Utah House committee unanimously voted to advance first substitute Senate Bill 92, a narrowly tailored change to the state’s prosecution law that would allow prosecutors in limited circumstances to charge a homicide where a prior prosecution for serious bodily injury was earlier concluded and the injured person later died from the injury.
Senator Wilson, sponsor of the measure commonly described in committee as "Desiree's Law," framed the legislation around the 2017 assault on Desiree Turner Buck and her subsequent death in 2025 from complications of her injuries. He said the bill adds a third exception to the general prohibition on subsequent prosecution in Utah Code (discussed in committee as Utah Code 76-1-405) and limits the reopening to homicide charges when (1) the earlier prosecution was for serious bodily injury, (2) the injured person later died as a proximate result, and (3) the earlier prosecution had concluded.
April Turner, Desiree’s mother, spoke to the panel. "This is what Des would have wanted," she said, urging lawmakers that fairness requires accountability when an earlier assault leads to later death. Carl Holland, executive director of the Statewide Association of Prosecutors, and representatives of the Sentencing Commission and victim-services groups described broad stakeholder collaboration on the draft language and said the bill allows judges to account for time already served in a way intended to avoid disparate treatment.
Defense and civil-rights perspectives were raised in committee discussion; counsel for criminal defense practitioners said they participated in drafting and that the measure includes language to address concerns such as credit for prior time served. Committee members asked whether analogous statutes in other states have survived appellate review; committee witnesses pointed to New York as a statutory example and said the attorney general’s office had vetted constitutional concerns.
Representative Thompson moved that the committee favorably recommend SB 92 to the House floor; the motion passed by voice vote and the chair ruled it unanimous.
The committee record shows lawmakers and stakeholders worked to narrow the scope of the exception to homicide offenses and include judicial discretion on sentencing credit. The bill now advances to the House for further consideration.