Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council defeats rezoning for 19156 Pearl Road after applicant withdraws request
Summary
After a noticed public hearing, Strongsville City Council voted to defeat ordinance 2025-128 to rezone 19156 Pearl Road from Public Facilities to General Business following the applicant's formal withdrawal; council recorded a final roll-call that defeated the proposal and closed the matter for now.
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Strongsville City Council voted on Jan. 20 to defeat an ordinance that would have rezoned 19156 Pearl Road (PPN 39431007) and an adjacent vacant parcel from Public Facilities to GB General Business after the applicant asked the city to withdraw the application.
The public hearing on ordinance 2025-128 opened as noticed. Mister Jamieson, the law director, told council that "they submitted an email last week" asking the application be withdrawn and explained the hearing proceeded only because the matter had already been publicly noticed. Mister Zacharias, planning, zoning and engineering, reiterated the recommendation that council respect the applicant's request and vote "no" to defeat the legislation so the matter could be closed.
The council considered motions, including a procedural motion to reconsider, then took a final roll-call vote on adoption. A motion to adopt the ordinance failed on the record; the roll calls recorded council members voting to defeat the measure, consistent with the administration's recommendation tied to the applicant's withdrawal. The motion to adopt was moved by Mister Clark and seconded by Miss Roth.
The ordinance listed the parcels by permanent parcel number (19156 Pearl Road, PPN 39431007; nearby vacant land PPN 39432001) and would have amended the city's zoning map (section 12.50.03 of Title 6, Part 12 of the codified ordinances). Because the applicant withdrew, council members stated they would honor that request while preserving the city's ability to consider future rezoning requests for the parcels.
The public hearing record will remain in the file, and no further action on this ordinance was taken at the Jan. 20 meeting.
