Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Silver Schools seeks PSFA support for Cliff project, outlines consolidation task force and community town halls

Silver Consolidated Schools Board of Education · September 18, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Superintendent William Hawkins told the Silver Consolidated Board of Education the district submitted three letters of intent to the Public Schools Finance Authority including a $45.8 million request for Cliff; he outlined PSFA/PSCOC steps, eligibility requirements and proposed a 15–20 person task force and town halls to study possible consolidations.

Superintendent William Hawkins told the Silver Consolidated Board of Education on Sept. 17 that the district has submitted three letters of intent to the Public Schools Finance Authority (PSFA) as part of the Public School Capital Outlay Council (PSCOC) process, including an initial $45,800,000 request tied to Cliff schools.

Hawkins said the other two letters cover an estimated $1.9 million HVAC project at Harrison and work to replace or upgrade fire-alarm/detection systems at Harrison, Cliff and parts of the Stout library; he also included La Plata Middle School’s main building in the submissions. “I have submitted 3 letters of intent to the public schools finance authority,” Hawkins told the board, and he described the letters as a way to notify PSFA of the district’s intended requests and to secure PSFA/PSCOC consideration and potential budget accounting for matching funds.

Why it matters: PSFA staff review eligibility, perform site visits and present recommendations to the PSCOC, which determines awards and award amounts. Hawkins said PSFA staff will visit campuses in September and that final applications are completed after PSFA review. He noted prerequisites for award include a current facilities master plan, use of the district’s Facility Information Maintenance System for maintenance records, and satisfactory facility maintenance assessment report (FMR) scores; Hawkins said buildings generally must meet an FMR threshold (the district uses 70 as an example) and cited Cliff’s most recent FMR as an example of a qualifying score.

Hawkins described the typical program categories the PSCOC funds—standards projects (major replacements/renovations) and systems projects (HVAC, roofing, electrical, plumbing)—and said most district campuses qualify for systems funding. He explained local matching requirements and the effect of recent legislation, noting that Senate Bill 131 temporarily reduced the local match to a larger PSCOC share. That reduced-match policy, Hawkins said, is scheduled to expire at the end of next year; he said he will engage the district’s legislative contacts to request an extension or other action to preserve the current match terms.

Consolidation task force and public engagement: Hawkins also revisited master-plan recommendations about school consolidation and proposed a task force to evaluate any recommendation. He laid out six criteria for the task force to weigh: district-wide capacity, the facilities and operational cost implications, impacts on students and families (with sensitivity to historically marginalized communities), effects on academic achievement and special programs, state and federal funding implications (including Title funding and small-rural adjustments), and transportation/boundary changes. “Any closure should not result in a shortage of classrooms district wide,” he told the board.

Hawkins recommended a smaller task force (about 15–20 people, drawn from the earlier facilities master plan participants) and said he expects to ask the board to submit candidate names. He also pledged public engagement: Hawkins said he plans at least four town halls—one at each elementary campus—starting as early as mid-October to present demographic and capacity data, answer questions and gather community input before any task-force recommendations are finalized.

Timing and costs: Hawkins warned that estimated project costs submitted in letters of intent are subject to change and that, under an optimistic schedule, the district should allow roughly 15–18 months from award to ground-breaking. He urged the board to be judicious about scope so PSCOC does not deem elements “excessive” and decline to fund them.

What’s next: Applications are open through Sept. 30; Hawkins said PSFA will perform its reviews and the district should be prepared to present to the PSCOC if invited. The board did not take a formal vote on consolidation at the meeting; members asked questions about class-size protections, public engagement and task-force composition and heard that staff will return with details on town-hall scheduling and candidate nominations.