Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Representative Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
RSU 40/MSAD 40 policy committee tables student-representative policy for clarification
Summary
The committee unanimously tabled the proposed student-representative policy after members found the sample language mis‑matched to the topic and asked staff to return a corrected redline; members emphasized encouraging student voices without granting vote rights.
The RSU 40/MSAD 40 policy committee voted unanimously to table its proposed policy on student representatives (BDBA) after members found the sample packet contained a mismatched code and language not tailored to student-representative duties. The motion to table passed 7–0 so staff can produce a corrected sample and a redlined version for the committee's next meeting.
Committee discussion emphasized the role the student representative should play. One member said student representatives "will be encouraged to share their viewpoints in the same manner as elected board members," and several members urged that student participants be welcomed, coached and asked to contribute beyond activity reports. The committee reiterated that student representatives do not vote.
Procedural concerns drove the decision to table: members asked staff to verify the sample's code (it appeared to reference a different policy) and to provide a document that displays deletions and additions in strike-through and bold so the committee can assess specific changes more efficiently. The staff assignment is to return a corrected, track‑changes/redline version at the next policy meeting.
Next steps: Central office staff will compare district language to an appropriate student-representative sample, prepare a redline showing deletions and additions, and return the item for committee consideration.
