Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Participation Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
RSU 40 committee discusses narrowing public comment to district stakeholders; asks staff for draft
Summary
Committee members debated whether to limit public comment to RSU 40 residents, taxpayers, parents, students and employees. No policy change was made; staff were asked to draft language for the next meeting that would prioritize district stakeholders while leaving a chair exception.
Get email alerts on the Public Participation Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The RSU 40 policy committee spent significant time discussing policy BEDH (public participation) and whether the district should prioritize speakers with direct ties to RSU 40.
Speaker 1 opened the issue by saying districts nearby had experienced heated meetings and suggested the committee consider guardrails to prevent marathon sessions. "What I would like to see is I'd like us to welcome feedback from the public, but I also wanna avoid having another 1AM marathon when it comes to public participation as well," Speaker 1 said.
Speaker 4 recommended draft language that would limit individual public-comment speakers to people with a direct stake in the district: "individual speaking at public comment must be a resident of RSU 40, a taxpayer, a parent or guardian of a student in RSU 40 schools, a student of RSU 40, or an employee of RSU 40," Speaker 4 said, while also proposing a chair exception to allow the board to invite an outside expert when appropriate.
Other members raised concerns about excluding outside experts or organized callers who might have relevant information; members noted the honor system limits enforcement of any self-identification rule. Speaker 2 suggested giving priority to local taxpayers and parents if time limits are needed, but stopping short of excluding non-residents entirely.
No formal motion was made to amend BEDH at this meeting. Members asked staff to prepare a written draft of proposed language and return it to the committee at the next meeting for consideration.

