Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cisa Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Witnesses warn proposed CISA cuts, layoffs could weaken state and local cyber defenses
Summary
An unidentified witness told the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs that a proposed cut of "20 plus percent" to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) budget and roughly "30%" staff reductions risk reducing assistance to small and medium businesses and state and local governments; the witness cited a track record of more than $500 million across 800 projects.
An unidentified speaker told the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs that proposed cuts to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, commonly known as CISA, and large staff reductions risk undermining state and local cybersecurity defenses.
"I'm very worried," the speaker said, adding that "the budget does a 20 plus percent, reduction has been proposed" and that "about 30% of the employees have been let go." The speaker described CISA as "a helping hand, not a regulatory agency," and stressed its role in getting threat information to smaller companies that cannot afford dedicated cyber teams.
The witness argued CISA has been ‘‘probably understaffed’’ relative to the scope of its responsibilities and warned that cyber threats are "getting bigger and more sophisticated," with state and local governments often representing the "weakest link in the chain." According to the speaker, state and local grant programs and CISA-supported projects have a record of more than $500,000,000 spent across roughly 800 projects to strengthen local defenses.
Committee members were told that many local governments and small and medium businesses lack the resources to hire specialized cybersecurity staff and therefore depend on federal support and shared threat information. The speaker said those investments are "so much more cost effective than trying to pick up pieces from cyber attacks."
The hearing record in the transcript contains assertions of proposed budget reductions, staffing losses and program totals as described above; the transcript does not record an immediate committee vote, formal staff directive, or an independent verification of the numerical claims. The committee discussion as recorded focused on the risks that reduced CISA capacity could pose to state and local partners and to small-business cybersecurity readiness.
No formal action or vote on the CISA budget was recorded in the provided transcript excerpt. The committee's next procedural steps were not specified in the excerpt.
