Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Board Work Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Personnel board approves adding intergovernmental/ regional relations to work plan in 3–1 vote
Summary
Los Alamos County's personnel board voted 3–1 to add an intergovernmental and regional-relations category to its work plan after brief debate over whether the topic falls within the board's advisory remit.
The Personnel Board voted to revise its work plan to add a category for intergovernmental and regional relationships and partnerships, passing the motion 3–1.
Speaker 5 moved to approve the revision to Attachment A of the work plan to add "intergovernmental/regional relationships and partnerships"; Speaker 4 called for the vote after brief discussion. Speaker 2 opposed the change, saying the proposed addition "is a little too much of a stretch" for the board's advisory role.
The vote was announced by Speaker 4 as "3 to 1 with member Husser opposing." The motion's text, as introduced, was to add the intergovernmental/regional category to the two existing categories in the work plan; a formal seconder was not specified in the transcript.
The board's debate centered on scope. Speaker 2 read aloud the code language describing the Personnel Board's responsibilities — "the personnel board shall serve in advisory capacity" and listed advisory duties including review of countywide personnel programs and an appellate role for disciplinary actions. Speaker 4 said that while some items might stretch the board’s purpose, "I can see it both ways" and suggested the board could be asked to advise on intergovernmental matters when appropriate.
Several members noted related past practice: the market study and whether to include Triad in salary comparisons had been discussed previously. Concerns were raised that broadening the work plan could pull the board away from core personnel duties; supporters said adding a category would allow the board to respond when county staff or council request advice.
The meeting adjourned after roughly 20 minutes. Participants also discussed scheduling and noted at least one member’s term ends March 31; the next formal meeting date was not specified in the transcript.
Speaker attributions in this article use the labels provided in the transcript (for example, "Speaker 2"). Where the transcript records a name ("member Husser") that name is used directly.
