Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fiscal Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Executive Finance Committee recommends FY24 audit report to full board after audit shows no findings
Summary
After a detailed presentation of FY24 accounting entries, the Executive Finance Committee voted to recommend the FY24 audit report — noting a $90,534.43 year‑end net loss driven largely by project‑specific and noncash items — to the full board for approval.
The Executive Finance Committee voted on Dec. 9 to recommend the Rutland Regional Planning Commission’s FY24 audit report to the full board after a staff presenter summarized the audit and identified several noncash accounting items that affected the year‑end results.
The presenter said, "the year ended with a net loss of 90,534.43," and explained that "$81,264 of that was the Rutland Creek Path" project for which the commission serves as fiscal agent. The presenter also said the RRPC net‑loss line was reported as "$9,270.43" and that, excluding certain interest and miscellaneous income, an alternative presentation would show a roughly "$14,700" deficit — but stressed these primarily reflect noncash adjustments recorded by the auditor.
Committee discussion focused on the source and consistency of several line items and schedules in the audit. The presenter reviewed a large annual journal entry recorded for retirement accounting (transcribed in the presentation as $4,044,666), an annual depreciation entry of about $52.66, a small interest expense of roughly $600, and a leasehold‑improvement write‑off of $19,482.28 related to the former premises at 67 Merchants Row. Staff flagged two balance‑sheet presentation items (a $1,500,000 figure and a $927,000 figure) where interest and matching amounts were handled differently than in the prior year and said they would confirm consistent presentation with the auditor.
Staff also outlined internal bookkeeping proposals tied to the audit: modest reclassifications of indirect‑cost allocations (moving $14.60 to direct expense and considering moving $53.33 into total allowable indirect expense) and minor edits to narrative and governance language in the final audit letter. The presenter said they expected any remaining edits to be technical and accepted by the auditor and that the changes would not affect audit findings.
A motion to recommend the FY24 audit report, with the changes presented and as accepted by the auditor, was made, seconded and approved by the committee. The recommendation will be forwarded to the full board of commissioners for final consideration.
